The purpose of this consultative process is to engage a broad set of family planning experts to identify what factors should be prioritized in selecting new family planning metrics at the global, country and programmatic levels.

To evaluate the efficacy of tulisokibart compared with placebo as assessed by the proportion of participants achieving clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index score (<150) at Week 52

The purpose of this research project is to investigate the impact of narrative medicine and the humanities on medicine and medical education. It is part of a larger literature review which will conclude with transcripts of interviews talking about this subject.

We are conducting electronic surveys to examine issues related to communication in primary care with US parents about HPV vaccination for their children ages 9-12 years.

This study is looking to obtain information from the prospective of patients with systemic sclerosis related to nutritional challenges. Our hope is to better record the thoughts and perspectives of patients living with systemic sclerosis to determine barriers to nutrition needs. The initial assessment will involve in-depth interviews with patients about food availability, food insecurity, food aversions, and diet quality to understand their perspectives and concerns related to systemic sclerosis.

The purpose of the study is to assess pediatric dentists experience with suspecting and reporting child maltreatment to child protective services.

The purpose of this research study is to understand how the management of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) could help improve surgical care for patients undergoing chest surgeries. PROs are symptoms directly reported by patients through the completion of a survey.

The purpose of this study is to determine if, and to what extent, elite cue-giving affects approval of nuclear energy. Participants will be assigned to either an experimental or control group. The experimental group will be asked to read a stimulus regarding nuclear energy directly cited from a renowned physicist, who functions as an elite cue giver. Then, participants will be asked to evaluate the extent to which they agree with statements such as, "nuclear energy is a reliable resource" and "nuclear energy should be advocated for by my political party more." The control group will read a similar stimulus that is not credited to any elite cue giver, and then evaluate the same statements as the experimental group. The investigator will then compare concerns and support for nuclear energy between the experimental and control group.

The purpose of this trial is to allow patients who are currently on the PROSERA trial to receive medication until the study drug is commercially available.

We are comparing the quality of feedback given to second year internal medicine residents by their peers vs. their supervisors, as well as feedback provided using a feedback vs. without the feedback tool.